INTRODUCTION

In a previous special edition of this journal leading into the 2022 FIFA World Cup, our original article discussed the notion of periodised recovery within elite football (Gregson et al., 2022). This conceptualised the idea of using recovery strategies in a periodised manner to mirror the demands of the game to adequately recover from the training and playing stress while also balancing the need for an adaptive response. The focus of periodisation in this context, centred on the typical weekly training micro-cycles encountered by elite players offering insights into the conceptual basis of periodised recovery, an overview of key recovery techniques and an example framework for a periodised approach to recovery.

Fast-forward four years and as the 2026 FIFA World Cup comes into focus, player recovery remains a ‘hot’ topic in the global game. Old problems remain and new challenges continue to emerge. Increased competition (e.g. Inaugural FIFA World Club Cup in 2025) has added further strain on an already congested fixture schedule, prompting intensified debate between the game’s global administrators and those responsible for player welfare. A focus of this second edition will therefore centre on player recovery within the context of the entire season. Specifically, how established within-week recovery practices can be configured to achieve different objectives on the recovery–adaptation continuum across ever increasingly complex and demanding seasonal schedules. Operational considerations for the large inter-disciplinary support teams overseeing player recovery will also be discussed within this framework.  An update on recovery interventions including those targeting mental fatigue and psychological stress will be provided as new research expands our understanding of the efficacy of new and emerging techniques. Finally, recovery considerations in female football will be discussed.

EMERGING RECOVERY INTERVENTIONS: AN UPDATE

The exercise-induced perturbations associated with football training and match-play result in concurrent physical and psychological fatigue involving a myriad of interacting systems, rendering a single or generic recovery strategy inappropriate for addressing individual recovery requirements (Minett & Costello, 2015). Consequently, recovery strategies were previously conceptualised within a periodised framework, whereby interventions are sequenced at specific time points to align with the dominant physiological stressors while preserving opportunities for favourable training adaptation (Gregson et al., 2022; Kellmann et al., 2018; Thorpe et al., 2017). The building blocks of this model including foundational behaviours such as sleep, nutrition, and hydration are prioritised, with adjunct recovery strategies selectively applied to target residual structural damage, metabolic stress, or movement restriction, alongside consideration of athlete belief and perceptual responses. In the absence of effective individual monitoring, aligning recovery strategies to the tactical periodisation structure of elite football provides a pragmatic, evidence-informed approach to managing the stress–recovery–adaptation continuum across different competition formats (Aquino et al., 2016). Furthermore, football performance reflects the concurrent development of multiple physical qualities, including strength, speed, and endurance, often within the same training cycle. As such, the periodisation of recovery techniques becomes particularly critical, as recovery strategies applied without consideration of these overlapping objectives may inadvertently influence the balance between recovery and adaptation.

Since the publication of our previous edition, relatively limited new applied empirical evidence has emerged for commonly used recovery modalities in elite football, particularly beyond their established short-term effects on perceptual responses, tissue extensibility and temperature specific alterations to tissue, blood flow and metabolism (Gregson et al., 2022). Notwithstanding, recent work has begun to expand understanding of heating-based interventions, alongside emerging data for photobiomodulation and psychologically dominant recovery strategies. Given the evolving competitive calendar and increasing emphasis on preserving training adaptation alongside readiness, a more detailed examination of emerging modalities is therefore warranted in this edition.

Heating Techniques

Heating-based recovery strategies, including hot-water immersion, diathermy, and sauna exposure, have received increased attention since our 2022 communication (Chaillou et al., 2022; Dablainville et al., 2025; Sautillet et al., 2024; Solsona et al., 2023; Steward et al., 2024). Mechanistically, post-exercise passive heating has been associated with increased muscle perfusion, modulation of inflammatory processes, and upregulation of heat-shock proteins, which might support tissue remodeling and regeneration (Dablainville et al., 2025; Sautillet et al., 2024). Recent human studies indicate that hot-water immersion following repeated, eccentric knee extensor exercise enhanced markers of muscle regeneration compared with cold-water immersion or passive recovery (Dablainville et al., 2025). Complementary findings suggest that heating can mitigate decrements in rate of force development following prolonged lower limb, high intensity resistance exercise (Sautillet et al., 2024). Furthermore, short-term training studies indicate that repeated post-exercise heating influenced training adaptation responses, including, enhancing satellite cell activity, myogenic signalling, muscle perfusion and oxygen delivery, substrate delivery and metabolite clearance. Contrastingly, repeated cooling has been shown to blunt anabolic signalling when applied immediately post-exercise and repeatedly over time (Chaillou & Treigyte, 2020; Roberts et al., 2015), although, the cooling interventions examined were highly standardised, they are not fully reflective of applied practice in elite football. Therefore, heating-based interventions may be best positioned beyond the acute phase of structural muscle damage, where recovery objectives shift toward supporting tissue remodelling and strength- or power-related adaptations, and where their application avoids potential interference associated with cooling-based strategies. While these data are not football-specific, they provide mechanistic insight relevant to team-sport contexts. Collectively, they also support a periodised approach in which heating modalities might be more appropriately positioned during adaptation-focused phases or selected recovery days, rather than indiscriminately applied immediately post-exercise and throughout the season.

Photobiomodulation

Photobiomodulation (PBM), or near-infrared (NIR) phototherapy is a non-invasive intervention using low-level light-emitting diodes or laser sources that has shown emerging potential to support post-exercise recovery. PBM is proposed to influence cellular processes at the mitochondrial level, including modulation of cytochrome c oxidase activity, increased oxygen utilisation, and enhanced adenosine triphosphate (ATP) production, thereby providing a plausible mechanistic basis for improved recovery responses (Ferraresi et al., 2016). A recent meta-analysis reported that NIR exposure attenuated post-exercise strength loss and reduce biochemical and perceptual markers of muscle damage, including creatine kinase and delayed-onset muscle soreness (DOMS) (Peng et al., 2022). In addition, experimental studies indicate that pre-exercise PBM enhanced endurance performance and reduced creatine kinase, lactate and perceived recovery further highlighting its potential versatility across exercise contexts and adaptation (Leal-Junior et al., 2015). Additionally, recent evidence has also explored the influence of PBM on sleep-related outcomes, including a systematic review reporting improvements in subjective and objective sleep-tracking metrics, alongside higher circulating melatonin concentrations and reduced nocturnal heart rate following whole-body PBM exposure (Álvarez-Martínez & Borden, 2025). Importantly, this review emphasised the dose-dependent nature of PBM responses, with favourable outcomes observed only within relatively narrow energy and power density ranges (e.g. ~24 J·cm^–² and ~5500 mW·cm^–²), underscoring the importance of exposure parameters in determining indivisualised efficacy. Consequently, rather than being applied indiscriminately, photobiomodulation should be positioned within a periodised recovery framework and preferentially applied away from phases dominated by acute structural muscle damage and cooling-based interventions, where its potential mechanisms may better align with independent physiological strategies targeting metabolic-dominant fatigue, such as active recovery and heating-based modalities. Further longitudinal research is required to clarify optimal dosing, timing, and integration alongside established recovery strategies.

Psychological Recovery

Physical recovery strategies have traditionally dominated applied practice, however, there is increasing evidence that mental fatigue and psychological stress meaningfully influence recovery, performance, and adaptation in elite football (Smith et al., 2018). Previous studies have demonstrated that mental fatigue can impair technical performance, decision-making, and physical output, even in the absence of marked physiological fatigue (Smith et al., 2015, 2018). In elite football, congested schedules, travel demands, social media and sleep disruption further exacerbate psychological strain and constrain recovery opportunity across the season (Nédélec et al., 2015). Psychological recovery has therefore been described as the “forgotten session”, reflecting its frequent omission from structured recovery planning despite its potential impact on readiness and training quality (Eccles et al., 2022). Sleep opportunity and sleep hygiene remain the most robustly supported psychological recovery strategies, with football-specific studies linking sleep disruption to impaired recovery, altered hormonal responses, and reduced performance capacity (Fullagar et al., 2015; Nédélec et al., 2015). Beyond sleep, emerging evidence suggests that mind–body techniques, including mindfulness, meditation, and controlled breathing, can influence neural pathways and autonomic regulation in athletes. Mindfulness-based interventions, characterised by deliberate present-moment attentional focus, have been shown to increase indices of heart rate variability following exercise, indicating enhanced parasympathetic reactivation. (Coimbra et al., 2021; Renaghan et al., 2023). Similarly, diaphragmatic breathing has been associated with greater parasympathetic activation compared with other relaxation strategies, alongside reductions in resting heart rate when implemented immediately post-training (Renaghan et al., 2023). Evidence from elite team sport athletes further indicates that short-term mindfulness interventions can reduce perceived mental fatigue during competition periods, despite minimal changes in physical fatigue or global recovery indices (Coimbra et al., 2021). Complementary findings suggest that meditation and breathing techniques may also attenuate the stress response via reductions in cortisol concentrations (Koncz et al., 2021). Importantly, these findings highlight the interdependence of psychological and physiological recovery processes, whereby psychological-dominant interventions may indirectly support physical recovery through modulation of autonomic balance, stress hormone responses, and perceptual fatigue.

Psychological strategies are unlikely to replace physically dominant recovery interventions but can be most effective when combined synergistically. For example, pairing breathing or mindfulness techniques with cooling, heating, or active recovery to address both central and peripheral components of fatigue may be recommended in elite settings. It is also important to recognise that psychological recovery may be facilitated through simple disengagement from the performance environment, including time spent away from the training ground with family or friends, exposure to natural environments, or engagement in personally meaningful activities. Given their low risk, high feasibility, and growing evidence base, cognitive–psychological strategies should therefore be planned and periodised alongside physical recovery interventions, rather than implemented ad hoc or in isolation.

Alternative techniques

Electromyostimulation (EMS) use has increased in recent years, with portable devices commonly applied post-training or competition. Few studies report improvements in perceived recovery and reductions in markers of muscle damage, potentially mediated via involuntary muscle contractions producing a muscle pump effect and increased local blood flow (Cook & Beaven, 2013). Substantial evidence supporting meaningful improvements in objective recovery or performance outcomes is limited, and data on repeated or chronic use in elite football are scarce.

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) involves breathing oxygen in a pressurised chamber and has been studied for its potential to speed up tissue healing, recovery and improve performance across various sports and scenarios (Huang et al., 2021; Mihajlovic et al., 2023). Although modest benefits for subsequent exercise performance and autonomic recovery have been reported to date (Mihajlovic et al., 2023), systematic review evidence indicates limited effects on post-exercise performance or muscle damage, with more consistent findings confined to muscle oxygenation and perceptual measures (Huang et al., 2021).

Intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) is widely adopted in elite football, with surveys reporting use across a large proportion of professional teams (Field et al., 2021). Clinically, compression increases blood flow and venous return (Feldman et al., 2012); however, exercise-based studies show equivocal effects on recovery outcomes, despite increases in post-exercise lactate clearance (Artés et al., 2024; Neves et al., 2025; Zelikovski et al., 1993). These devices could therefore be best conceptualised as a passive form of active recovery, with unclear added benefit beyond low-intensity movement and perceptual recovery.

Blood flow restriction (BFR) involves partial vascular occlusion using cuffs, garments or wraps applied proximally to the limb (Oliva-Lozano et al., 2024). Although often considered an emerging technique, BFR has been investigated for over two decades, primarily to augment training adaptations rather than recovery (Loenneke et al., 2025; Shinohara et al., 1998). Evidence for recovery-specific benefits is limited, though short-term reductions in pain sensitivity have been reported (Loenneke et al., 2025). The mechanisms and chronic implications of these effects remain unclear. While safety concerns have been raised, adverse events appear rare, although, the risk of exacerbating cellular stress and damage during acute structural damage and high metabolic stress periods is plausible (Oliva-Lozano et al., 2024). Given the resource demands and opportunity costs associated with these modalities, their routine use should be approached cautiously, particularly where they may displace recovery strategies with stronger evidence bases such as sleep optimisation, nutrition, and appropriate load management.

PERIODISED RECOVERY STRATEGY FRAMEWORK FOR THE ELITE FOOTBALL PLAYER: AN UPDATE

In our previous publication we proposed an evidence-informed approach to periodising recovery techniques in relation to typical tactical training models. During two-game weeks the primary objective is to balance recovery with enhancement of adaptive responses, whereas during three-game weeks the priority shifts toward recovery consolidation, with competition match-play serving as the principal anchor point due to its combined mechanical, metabolic and psychological stress. Tactical periodisation has also evolved somewhat in recent years with coaches and performance staff condensing physical development emphases on MD+3 and MD+4 and recovery or a day off prescribed on MD-2 (Figure 3). All formats, warrant psychological-dominant recovery strategies (e.g. breathing-based techniques, mindfulness, structured decompression) preferentially positioned on match day (MD) and MD+1, where acute perceptual fatigue, structural damage, cognitive load, and autonomic disturbance are most pronounced (Figure 1 and 2). Placement at these time points reflects evidence indicating that such interventions support parasympathetic reactivation, stress modulation, and reductions in perceived mental fatigue during early recovery, complementing or coupled with physically dominant recovery strategies targeting mechanical and metabolic stress. As the microcycle progresses and training emphasis transitions from recovery toward conditioning and adaptation (typically MD+3 in two-game weeks and MD-2 in both two- and three-game formats), photobiomodulation could be integrated alongside active recovery and heating-based strategies (Figure 1 and 2). Positioning PBM on MD+3 and MD-2 align with emerging evidence suggesting potential benefits for metabolic recovery, cellular energetics, and perceptual fatigue during periods characterised by higher metabolic training stress. In this context, PBM is not intended to replace established recovery modalities, but to complement interventions targeting circulation, tissue remodeling, and restoration of movement quality. Collectively, this updated microcycle framework reflects a stress-matched, periodised approach in which physical- and psychological-dominant recovery interventions are strategically combined according to the timing and nature of fatigue, and can be applied across different periodised training models provided recovery strategies are coherently embedded within the broader seasonal plan.

PERIODISING RECOVERY ACROSS THE FOOTBALL SEASON

Periodised recovery within the weekly microcycle remains fundamental for managing acute match-induced stress and supporting readiness for subsequent training or competition. However, the balance between stress, recovery, and adaptation is not static across the competitive year, with seasonal phases differing in training emphasis, match density, and cumulative physiological and psychological fatigue exposure. As such, effective recovery planning requires that microcycle-level strategies are embedded whilst non-competing, within a season-long framework, allowing recovery objectives to shift appropriately between adaptation-focused and recovery-dominant phases. Across a competitive season, elite football players are exposed to fluctuating demands driven by shifts in training objectives (strength, speed and endurance), match frequency, and contextual stressors, resulting in distinct recovery-adaptation approaches during pre-season, early competition, congested mid-season periods, and end-season phases (Dupont et al., 2010; Ekstrand et al., 2018; Thorpe et al., 2015). Observational studies indicate that injury rates vary across the competitive season, with modest increases reported during congested periods and later stages of competition (Bengtsson et al., 2013; Dupont et al., 2010; Ekstrand et al., 2018). While such data provide important contextual information, injury incidence reflects a complex interaction of training and match exposure, and individual characteristics, and should not be interpreted as a direct consequence of any one isolated construct. Rather, these observations reinforce the importance of recovery as part of a broader, season-long strategy aimed at supporting performance maintenance and adaptation development. Psychological demands also evolve across the season and congested schedules, frequent travel, and cumulative performance pressure may constrain recovery opportunity and influence recovery behaviours, particularly during decisive phases of competition (Nédélec et al., 2015). These factors further support the need for a periodised approach that accounts for both physiological and psychological dominant recovery demands over time. A season-long recovery approach requires alignment between recovery intent, training objectives, and competitive demands, with strategies matched to the dominant physiological and psychological goals of each phase and adjusted for contextual factors such as match density and individual exposure. Recovery interventions are not physiologically neutral, as longitudinal evidence demonstrated that chronic post-exercise cold-water immersion can attenuate strength and hypertrophic adaptations (Petersen & Fyfe, 2021; Roberts et al., 2015), while applied monitoring studies in elite football indicate that selective recovery allows players to tolerate and benefit from targeted training stimuli within the same microcycle (Thorpe et al., 2015, 2016).

Figure 4. illustrates the seasonal stress-recovery-adaptation periodisation across a typical competitive year. During pre-season, recovery strategies should support training quality, load tolerance, and the development of physical robustness. While managing excessive symptom burden such as DOMS and perceptual fatigue remains important, indiscriminate suppression of fatigue could be counterproductive if it compromises the intended training stimulus and subsequent adaptation. In the early competitive phase, recovery objectives typically shift toward balancing readiness for match-play (often only competing in two-game weeks) with retention and amplification of training-induced adaptations. Recovery practices during this period should facilitate consistent exposure to both training and competition loads without allowing fatigue to accumulate to a level that negatively influences performance or injury risk. During mid-season and periods of fixture congestion, including international fixtures and cup competitions, recovery objectives are often biased toward protecting player availability and managing symptom burden under constrained recovery windows. Repeated match exposure with limited recovery time may impair restoration of neuromuscular, metabolic, structural and perceptual markers, necessitating greater emphasis on short-term readiness (Mohr et al., 2015). Toward the end of the season and during major international tournaments, cumulative physical and psychological load can be substantial, while opportunities for additional training stimulus are limited. Recovery objectives during these phases therefore must prioritise fatigue management, psychological well-being, parasympathetic activation and maintenance of availability.

Adopting a season-long recovery framework does not replace established within-week recovery practices, but rather provides the context within which they are applied. Consolidation of recovery in the immediate post-match period remains essential to restore function and prepare players for subsequent exposure. However, within the same microcycle, training sessions may be deliberately designed to stimulate adaptation, particularly during phases prioritising physical development or maintenance. This integrated approach can be conceptualised along a recovery–adaptation continuum, whereby recovery interventions may be biased toward availability protection during congested schedules, but applied more selectively during phases with greater training opportunity. Such an approach allows practitioners to consolidate post-match recovery while still facilitating adaptation within the same week, provided recovery strategies are aligned with training intent and individual context.

RECOVERY CONSIDERATIONS IN FEMALE FOOTBALL

The physical and psychological demands of elite women’s football have increased substantially in recent years resulting in greater match intensity, fixture congestion, expanded competition calendars, and rising off-field demands associated with professionalism (FIFA, 2024; Scott and Bradley, 2020). As a result, recovery has become a central tenant to support female athletes through the demands of the periodised season. While recovery is universally important across sexes, female athletes have unique biological and psychobiological considerations that necessitate a nuanced and individualised approach. Despite this, the evidence base underpinning recovery strategies in women’s football remains limited and is largely extrapolated from male or mixed-sex data (Howatson et al., 2025).

In females, there are subtle recovery differences to males which are thought to be, at least in part, attributable to anatomical difference and fluctuations in endogenous and exogenous sex hormones (Hunter & Senefeld, 2024). These hormonal differences (oestrogen and progesterone) changes could conceptually affect performance or modulate the time course of recovery (Elliott-Sale et al., 2020; McNulty et al., 2020). It is important to note the lack of data means a consensus is difficult to ascertain. For example, there is evidence to suggest oestrogen might have a protective effect on biomarkers of muscle damage (Hackney et al., 2019), which are elevated following competition and strenuous training. These data suggested that the capacity to recover in females might be greater in mid-luteal phase compared to mid-follicular phase of the menstrual cycle, when oestrogen and progesterone are lower.  Furthermore, the pre-menstrual phase of the cycle is characterised by increased inflammation (Bertone-Johnson et al., 2014; Bruinvels et al., 2021) and varying severity of menstrual symptoms such as disturbed sleep, cramps, brain fog, anxiety that could all have physical and mental implications for performance (Oester et al., 2024). This also brings to light the need to consider this biological milieu in females footballers and the implications to periodising recovery strategies based on the individual athlete's needs (Howatson et al., 2025).

Akin to male footballers, females can only really benefit from recovery strategies when the foundational behaviours and consistently delivered.  Similarly to males (Brownstein et al., 2017; Goodall et al., 2017; Thomas et al., 2017), the demands of the elite female game result in perturbations muscle function, soreness, and perceptual fatigue that can commonly remain for up to 72 hours following competition, particularly during congested schedules (Andersson et al., 2008; Brown et al., 2024; Ishida et al., 2021). Consequently, good sleep duration and quality, adequate energy availability, and hydration must be the initial priorities for females (Halson et al., 2025; Howatson et al., 2025). Sleep disruption is particularly prevalent in female football, influenced by the combination of late-evening kick-offs, travel, psychological stress, and hormonal fluctuations across the menstrual cycle. Suboptimal sleep not only delays physical recovery but also impairs mental recovery, decision-making, and emotional regulation (Halson et al., 2025; Howatson et al., 2025). These pillars of recovery will undoubtedly have the greatest influence on physiological restoration, immune function, cognitive performance, and hormonal regulation, and should therefore be considered non-negotiable.

It has long been known that insufficient recovery can result in cumulative fatigue, maladaptation, and heightened injury risk, which are of particularly relevance given that match injury incidence in women’s football is substantially (~6-fold) higher in matches compared to training (López-Valenciano et al., 2021), therefore an informed and pragmatic approach to female football recovery is required. For example, despite the laws and duration of the game between males and females being identical, females have been shown to have greater glycogen depletion following matches compared to males, which results in reduced sprint ability towards the end of matches (Krustrup et al., 2022).  It is also known that females have a greater type 1 fibre composition than males and might explain this sex differences in this ability to maintain anaerobic work. Conversely females with a greater type 1 fibre composition will possess a greater propensity for endurance performance (Ansdell et al., 2020).  When these and other sex-differences are combined it highlights the need for nuanced approaches. Consequently, recovery strategies should be selected and periodised in line with the intended match demands and training schedules, prioritising adaptation during preparation phases, while emphasising rapid restoration of performance during competition and tournament settings (Howatson et al., 2025), but critically considering sex differences.  Simple ways to move towards a better approach to conventional monitoring should include monitoring menstrual cycle characteristics, symptom severity, and perceived recovery.  This information can provide valuable contextual information to inform recovery decision-making. While the evidence base is incomplete, integrating menstrual cycle awareness into recovery planning aligns with a more precision-based approach to athlete recovery.

In addition to the physical recovery, mental recovery remains an under-recognised component of the overall recovery process in female sport (Russell et al., 2019). Female footballers are exposed to substantial cognitive and emotional demands arising from training and competition but also from media exposure, social scrutiny, contractual uncertainty, dual careers (often due to lower financial rewards), and caring responsibilities (Russell et al., 2019, 2024). Accordingly, recovery strategies targeting psychological restoration, such as structured breathing techniques, exposure to restorative environments, napping, and sleep hygiene interventions could be integrated alongside physical recovery practices (Loch et al., 2019; Sun et al., 2022). Although female-specific evidence remains sparse, these approaches are low-risk, accessible, and align with a holistic model of athlete care.

Despite growing recognition of the importance of recovery in women’s football, there are significant knowledge gaps where integrated physical and mental recovery models are considered. Until such data are available, practitioners must combine the best available evidence with contextual intelligence, athlete monitoring, and interdisciplinary collaboration. Education plays a critical role in fostering understanding, adherence, and informed decision-making, particularly in environments where misinformation and “recovery fads” might be prevalent (Howatson et al., 2025). Recovery practices should be individualised, accounting for physiological responses, menstrual cycle symptoms, psychological state, and personal preferences. The current challenge is striking an appropriate balance between evidence-based practice, individual responsiveness and experience though practice-based evidence.

ORGANISATIONAL AND STRUCTURAL CONSIDERATIONS IN IMPLEMENTING RECOVERY PERIODISATION

Effective recovery periodisation in professional football extends beyond physiological principles to include organisational structure, departmental alignment, and cultural context. Despite advances in recovery science, applied practice is often shaped by logistical constraints, coaching philosophy, and athlete belief rather than evidence alone (Carling, 2013).

Recovery decision-making frequently involves multiple departments with differing priorities, including performance development, player health, and competitive readiness. Organisational structure in elite football often occupies a grey zone between performance, medical, and coaching departments, which can complicate decision-making and implementation. Misalignment between these objectives may result in inconsistent recovery application, particularly during congested schedules. Unlike training load prescription or injury rehabilitation, recovery strategies are frequently shared responsibilities, with overlapping but sometimes competing objectives related to performance readiness, adaptation, and risk management. As a result, common recovery techniques could be applied with different intent across departments, potentially leading to contradictory outcomes.

For example, interventions such as cold-water immersion might be favoured from a short-term readiness or symptom-management perspective, while simultaneously raising concerns regarding potential interference with training adaptation to strength training when used repeatedly following adaptation-focused sessions. Without a shared framework, these competing priorities may result in inconsistent or non-periodised recovery application between stakeholders across the season. Establishing clear governance structures and shared recovery objectives aligned to seasonal phase is therefore critical to ensuring that recovery strategies are applied coherently and in a manner consistent with overall performance goals. Establishing shared frameworks including effective monitoring approaches and clearly defined recovery objectives across seasonal phases may improve coherence.

Evidence from other high-performance and safety-critical industries highlights that outcomes are optimised when teams align around shared objectives, clearly defined processes, and collective ownership rather than operating in disciplinary silos. In healthcare and aviation, alignment of goals and workflows across professional groups has been shown to improve performance, reduce error, and enhance consistency under time pressure (Gittell, 2002; Pronovost et al., 2006; Salas et al., 2008). Indeed, a recent UEFA qualitative study that teams reporting higher levels of communication and collaboration between medical and performance staff experienced a lower hamstring injury burden, highlighting the importance of interdisciplinary alignment in injury risk management (Ekstrand et al., 2025). Translating these principles to elite football, recovery periodisation is more likely to be effective when medical, performance, and coaching staff share a common framework and outcome focus, thereby reducing contradictory practices and improving coherence across the recovery–adaptation process.

SUMMARY AND FUTURE DIRECTION

Recovery in elite football is a complex, multi-dimensional process involving interacting physiological and psychological systems that evolve across both the acute microcycle and long-term seasonal timescales. As competitive calendars become increasingly congested, recovery can no longer be considered static or uniform. Instead, recovery strategies should be applied in a periodised manner, aligned to the dominant stressors and objectives of each phase of the season, while balancing short-term restoration with longer-term adaptation.

This updated paper extends our previous work by embedding microcycle-based recovery principles within a broader season-long framework. Foundational behaviours such as sleep, nutrition, and hydration remain central, while adjunct recovery strategies should be selected and timed according to their efficacy, mechanistic plausibility, and interaction with training adaptation. Importantly, the female game presents unique challenges to negotiate given the sex differences that can influence performance and recovery; but it also highlights an opportunity for practitioners and researchers to develop new knowledge to inform better practice. Emerging evidence supports more selective application of heating-based interventions, photobiomodulation, and psychologically dominant recovery strategies, particularly when aligned with periods of metabolic or cognitive stress. In contrast, several popular modalities continue to lack empiricalevidencereinforcing the need for critical implementation.

Future research should examine mechanistic responses in males and females athletes adopting study designs that more closely reflect applied practice including combinations and sequencing of recovery strategies. Integration of physiological, neuromuscular and cognitive markers will further advance understanding to improve practice. Ultimately, effective recovery periodisation will depend on interdisciplinary alignment, contextual intelligence, and the use of valid monitoring approaches to individualise recovery within a coherent seasonal framework.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Efthymios Kyprianou for producing figures 1-3 for this article.

Robin Thorpe PhD

College of Health Solutions

Arizona State University

Phoenix, AZ, USA

Department of Sport and Exercise Sciences

 Manchester Metropolitan University Institute of Sport

Manchester, UK

Glyn Howatson PhD

Professor

Department of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation

Northumbria University

Water Research Group

Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences

North West University

Warren Gregson PhD, MBA

Professor

Department of Sport and Exercise Sciences

Manchester Metropolitan University

Institute of Sport

Manchester, UK

Contacts:

robin.thorpe@live.co.uk

References

1. Álvarez-Martínez, M., & Borden, G. (2025). A systematic review on whole-body photobiomodulation for exercise performance and recovery. Lasers in Medical Science, 40(1), 55. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10103-025-04318-W,
2. Andersson, H., Raastad, T., Nilsson, J., Paulsen, G., Garthe, I., & Kadi, F. (2008). Neuromuscular fatigue and recovery in elite female soccer: effects of active recovery. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 40(2), 372–380. https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0b013e31815b8497
3. Ansdell, P., Thomas, K., Hicks, K. M., Hunter, S. K., Howatson, G., & Goodall, S. (2020). Physiological sex differences affect the integrative response to exercise: acute and chronic implications. Experimental Physiology, 105(12), 2007–2021. https://doi.org/10.1113/EP088548
4. Aquino, R. L. Q. T., Cruz Gonçalves, L. G., Palucci Vieira, L. H., Oliveira, L. P., Alves, G. F., Pereira Santiago, P. R., & Puggina, E. F. (2016). Periodization Training Focused on Technical-Tactical Ability in Young Soccer Players Positively Affects Biochemical Markers and Game Performance. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 30(10), 2723–2732. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000001381
5. Artés, A., Ferrer-Ramos, P., Javierre, C., Viscor, G., & García, I. (2024). Effects of intermittent pneumatic compression on the recovery of cardiovascular parameters after repeated sprint exercise. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 124(4), 1037–1048. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-023-05333-x
6. Bengtsson, H., Ekstrand, J., & Hägglund, M. (2013). Muscle injury rates in professional football increase with fixture congestion: An 11-year follow-up of the UEFA Champions League injury study. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 47(12), 743–747. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2013-092383
7. Bertone-Johnson, E. R., Ronnenberg, A. G., Houghton, S. C., Nobles, C., Zagarins, S. E., Takashima-Uebelhoer, B. B., Faraj, J. L., & Whitcomb, B. W. (2014). Association of inflammation markers with menstrual symptom severity and premenstrual syndrome in young women. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England), 29(9), 1987–1994. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deu170
8. Brown, G. A., Massard, T., Wignell, T., McCall, A., & Duffield, R. (2024). Match Exposure, Consecutive Match Number, and Recovery Days Affect Match Running During International Women’s Soccer Tournaments. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 38(3), 577–583. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000004667
9. Brownstein, C. G., Dent, J. P., Parker, P., Hicks, K. M., Howatson, G., Goodall, S., & Thomas, K. (2017). Etiology and Recovery of Neuromuscular Fatigue following Competitive Soccer Match-Play. Frontiers in Physiology, 8(OCT). https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00831
10. Bruinvels, G., Goldsmith, E., Blagrove, R., Simpkin, A., Lewis, N., Morton, K., Suppiah, A., Rogers, J. P., Ackerman, K. E., Newell, J., & Pedlar, C. (2021). Prevalence and frequency of menstrual cycle symptoms are associated with availability to train and compete: a study of 6812 exercising women recruited using the Strava exercise app. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 55(8), 438–443. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2020-102792
11. Carling, C. (2013). Interpreting physical performance in professional soccer match-play: Should we be more pragmatic in our approach? Sports Medicine, 43(8), 655–663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-013-0055-8
12. Chaillou, T., & Treigyte, V. (2020). Cold water immersion puts the chill on muscle protein synthesis after resistance exercise. The Journal of Physiology, 598(6), 1123–1124. https://doi.org/10.1113/JP279404
13. Chaillou, T., Treigyte, V., Mosely, S., Brazaitis, M., Venckunas, T., & Cheng, A. J. (2022). Functional Impact of Post-exercise Cooling and Heating on Recovery and Training Adaptations: Application to Resistance, Endurance, and Sprint Exercise. Sports Medicine - Open 2022 8:1, 8(1), 37-. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-022-00428-9
14. Coimbra, D. R., Bevilacqua, G. G., Pereira, F. S., & Andrade, A. (2021). Effect of Mindfulness Training on Fatigue and Recovery in Elite Volleyball Athletes: A Randomized Controlled Follow-Up Study. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 20(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.52082/JSSM.2021.1
15. Cook, C. J., & Beaven, C. M. (2013). Individual perception of recovery is related to subsequent sprint performance. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 47(11), 705–709. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2012-091647
16. Dablainville, V., Mornas, A., Normand-Gravier, T., Al-Mulla, M., Papakostas, E., Olory, B., Fermin, T. M., Zampeli, F., Nader, N., Alhammoud, M., Bayne, F., Sanchez, A. M. J., Cardinale, M., Candau, R., Bernardi, H., & Racinais, S. (2025). Muscle regeneration is improved by hot water immersion but unchanged by cold following a simulated musculoskeletal injury in humans. The Journal of Physiology, 603(23), 7603–7625. https://doi.org/10.1113/JP287777
17. Dupont, G., Nedelec, M., McCall, A., McCormack, D., Berthoin, S., & Wisløff, U. (2010). Effect of 2 soccer matches in a week on physical performance and injury rate. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 38, 1752–1758. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546510361236
18. Eccles, D. W., Balk, Y., Gretton, T. W., & Harris, N. (2022). “The forgotten session”: Advancing research and practice concerning the psychology of rest in athletes. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 34(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200.2020.1756526;JOURNAL:JOURNAL:UASP20;SUBPAGE:STRING:ACCESS
19. Ekstrand, J., Hägglund, M., Waldén, M., Gauffin, H., Baudot, C., Biosca, P., Braun, M., Dittmar, K. H., Kalogiannidis, D., McNally, S., Pruna, R., Puga, N., Sala, M., Stefanini, L., Ueblacker, P., Vanhecke, B., Van Wijk, M., Van Zoest, W., Alonso, J. M. V., & Spreco, A. (2025). Higher level of communication between the medical staff and the performance staff is associated with a lower hamstring injury burden: a substudy on 14 teams from the UEFA Elite Club Injury Study. BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002182
20. Ekstrand, J., Spreco, A., & Davison, M. (2018). Elite football teams that do not have a winter break lose on average 303 player-days more per season to injuries than those teams that do: A comparison among 35 professional European teams. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 53(19). https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2018-099506
21. Elliott-Sale, K. J., McNulty, K. L., Ansdell, P., Goodall, S., Hicks, K. M., Thomas, K., Swinton, P. A., & Dolan, E. (2020). The Effects of Oral Contraceptives on Exercise Performance in Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Sports Medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 50(10), 1785–1812. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-020-01317-5
22. Feldman, J. L., Stout, N. L., Wanchai, A., Stewart, B. R., Cormier, J. N., & Armer, J. M. (2012). Intermittent pneumatic compression therapy: a systematic review. Lymphology, 45(1), 13–25. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22768469
23. Ferraresi, C., Huang, Y. Y., & Hamblin, M. R. (2016). Photobiomodulation in human muscle tissue: an advantage in sports performance? Journal of Biophotonics, 9(11–12), 1273. https://doi.org/10.1002/JBIO.201600176
24. Field, A., Harper, L. D., Chrismas, B. C. R., Fowler, P. M., McCall, A., Paul, D. J., Chamari, K., & Taylor, L. (2021). The Use of Recovery Strategies in Professional Soccer: A Worldwide Survey. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 16(12), 1804–1815. https://doi.org/10.1123/IJSPP.2020-0799
25. Fullagar, H. H., Duffield, R., Skorski, S., Coutts, A. J., Julian, R., & Meyer, T. (2015). Sleep and Recovery in Team Sport: Current Sleep-related Issues Facing Professional Team-sport Athletes. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2014-0565
26. Gittell, J. H. (2002). Relationships between Service Providers and Their Impact on Customers. Journal of Service Research, 4(4), 299–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670502004004007
27. Goodall, S., Thomas, K., Harper, L. D., Hunter, R., Parker, P., Stevenson, E., West, D., Russell, M., & Howatson, G. (2017). The assessment of neuromuscular fatigue during 120 min of simulated soccer exercise. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 117(4), 687–697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-017-3561-9
28. Gregson, W., Howatson, G., & Thorpe, R. (2022). A PERIODISED RECOVERY STRATEGY FRAMEWORK FOR THE ELITE FOOTBALL PLAYER. Aspetar Sports Medicine Journal, 11.
29. Hackney, A. C., Kallman, A. L., & Aǧgön, E. (2019). Female sex hormones and the recovery from exercise: Menstrual cycle phase affects responses. Biomedical Human Kinetics, 11(1), 87–89. https://doi.org/10.2478/bhk-2019-0011
30. Halson, S. L., Bender, A., Howatson, G., & Pedlar, C. (2025). Uncovering Sleep Behaviour in Women’s Football: What Evidence Do We Have? Sports Medicine (Auckland, N.Z.). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-025-02247-w
31. Howatson, G., Russell, S., Pedlar, C., & Halson, S. (2025). Physical and Mental Recovery for Female Footballers: Considerations and Approaches for Better Practice. Sports Medicine 2025, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-025-02246-x
32. Huang, X., Wang, R., Zhang, Z., Wang, G., & Gao, B. (2021). Effects of Pre-, Post- and Intra-Exercise Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy on Performance and Recovery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Physiology, 12, 791872. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.791872
33. Hunter, S. K., & Senefeld, J. W. (2024). Sex differences in human performance. Journal of Physiology, 602(17), 4129–4156. https://doi.org/10.1113/JP284198
34. Ishida, A., Bazyler, C. D., Sayers, A. L., Mizuguchi, S., & Gentles, J. A. (2021). Acute Effects of Match-Play on Neuromuscular and Subjective Recovery and Stress State in Division I Collegiate Female Soccer Players. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 35(4), 976–982. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000003981
35. Kellmann, M., Bertollo, M., Bosquet, L., Brink, M., Coutts, A. J., Duffield, R., Erlacher, D., Halson, S. L., Hecksteden, A., Heidari, J., Wolfgang Kallus, K., Meeusen, R., Mujika, nigo, Robazza, C., Skorski, S., Venter, R., Beckmann, J., Lucia, S., & Bertollo, A. (2018). Recovery and Performance in Sport: Consensus Statement. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 13, 240–245. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2017-0759
36. Koncz, A., Demetrovics, Z., & Takacs, Z. K. (2021). Meditation interventions efficiently reduce cortisol levels of at-risk samples: a meta-analysis. Health Psychology Review, 15(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2020.1760727
37. Krustrup, P., Mohr, M., Nybo, L., Draganidis, D., Randers, M. B., Ermidis, G., Ørntoft, C., Røddik, L., Batsilas, D., Poulios, A., Ørtenblad, N., Loules, G., Deli, C. K., Batrakoulis, A., Nielsen, J. L., Jamurtas, A. Z., & Fatouros, I. G. (2022). Muscle metabolism and impaired sprint performance in an elite women’s football game. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 32 Suppl 1(S1), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.13970
38. Leal-Junior, E. C. P., Vanin, A. A., Miranda, E. F., de Carvalho, P. de T. C., Dal Corso, S., & Bjordal, J. M. (2015). Effect of phototherapy (low-level laser therapy and light-emitting diode therapy) on exercise performance and markers of exercise recovery: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Lasers in Medical Science, 30(2), 925–939. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10103-013-1465-4,
39. Loch, F., Ferrauti, A., Meyer, T., Pfeiffer, M., & Kellmann, M. (2019). Resting the mind – A novel topic with scarce insights. Considering potential mental recovery strategies for short rest periods in sports. Performance Enhancement & Health, 6(3–4), 148–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PEH.2019.04.002
40. Loenneke, J. P., Hammert, W. B., Kataoka, R., Yamada, Y., & Abe, T. (2025). Twenty-five years of blood flow restriction training: What we know, what we don’t, and where to next? Journal of Sports Sciences, 43(19), 2115–2132. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2474329
41. López-Valenciano, A., Raya-González, J., Garcia-Gómez, J. A., Aparicio-Sarmiento, A., Sainz de Baranda, P., De Ste Croix, M., & Ayala, F. (2021). Injury Profile in Women’s Football: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sports Medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 51(3), 423–442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-020-01401-w
42. McNulty, K. L., Elliott-Sale, K. J., Dolan, E., Swinton, P. A., Ansdell, P., Goodall, S., Thomas, K., & Hicks, K. M. (2020). The Effects of Menstrual Cycle Phase on Exercise Performance in Eumenorrheic Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sports Medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 50(10), 1813–1827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-020-01319-3
43. Mihajlovic, M., Cabarkapa, Dimitrije, Cabarkapa, Damjana V., Philipp, N. M., & Fry, A. C. (2023). Recovery Methods in Basketball: A Systematic Review. Sports, 11(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/SPORTS11110230,
44. Minett, G. M., & Costello, J. T. (2015). Specificity and context in post-exercise recovery: It is not a one-size-fits-all approach. Frontiers in Physiology, 6(APR). https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2015.00130
45. Mohr, M., Draganidis, D., Chatzinikolaou, A., Barbero-Álvarez, J. C., Castagna, C., Douroudos, I., Avloniti, A., Margeli, A., Papassotiriou, I., Flouris, A. D., Jamurtas, A. Z., Krustrup, P., & Fatouros, I. G. (2015). Muscle damage, inflammatory, immune and performance responses to three football games in 1 week in competitive male players. European Journal of Applied Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-015-3245-2
46. Nédélec, M., Halson, S., Abaidia, A. E., Ahmaidi, S., & Dupont, G. (2015). Stress, Sleep and Recovery in Elite Soccer: A Critical Review of the Literature. Sports Medicine, 45(10), 1387–1400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-015-0358-z
47. Neves, R. S., Furtado, G. E., da Silva, M. A. R., Caldo-Silva, A., Rezende, M. dos A. C. de, & Pinheiro, J. (2025). Effects of intermittent pneumatic compression as a recovery method after exercise: A comprehensive review. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, 42, 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.12.029
48. Oester, C., Norris, D., Scott, D., Pedlar, C., Bruinvels, G., & Lovell, R. (2024). Inconsistencies in the perceived impact of the menstrual cycle on sport performance and in the prevalence of menstrual cycle symptoms: A scoping review of the literature. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 27(6), 373–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2024.02.012
49. Oliva-Lozano, J. M., Patterson, S. D., Chiampas, G., Maybury, E., & Cost, R. (2024). Blood flow restriction as a post-exercise recovery strategy: A systematic review of the current status of the literature. Biology of Sport, 41(3), 191–200. https://doi.org/10.5114/BIOLSPORT.2024.133664,
50. Peng, J., Zhao, J., Tang, Q., Wang, J., Song, W., Lu, X., Huang, X., Chen, G., Zheng, W., Zhang, L., Han, Y., Yan, C., Wan, Q., & Chen, L. (2022). Low intensity near-infrared light promotes bone regeneration via circadian clock protein cryptochrome 1. International Journal of Oral Science, 14(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/S41368-022-00207-Y;SUBJMETA=474,582,631,692,699,80;KWRD=DISEASES,UBIQUITYLATION
51. Petersen, A. C., & Fyfe, J. J. (2021). Post-exercise Cold Water Immersion Effects on Physiological Adaptations to Resistance Training and the Underlying Mechanisms in Skeletal Muscle: A Narrative Review. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2021.660291
52. Pronovost, P., Needham, D., Berenholtz, S., Sinopoli, D., Chu, H., Cosgrove, S., Sexton, B., Hyzy, R., Welsh, R., Roth, G., Bander, J., Kepros, J., & Goeschel, C. (2006). An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. The New England Journal of Medicine, 355(26), 2725–2732. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa061115
53. Renaghan, E., Wishon, M. J., Wittels, H. L., Feigenbaum, L. A., Bellamy, K., Hatfield, M., Girardi, J., Lee, S., McDonald, S. M., & Wittels, S. H. (2023). The effects of relaxation techniques following acute, high intensity football training on parasympathetic reactivation. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 5, 1267631. https://doi.org/10.3389/FSPOR.2023.1267631/BIBTEX
54. Roberts, L. A., Raastad, T., Markworth, J. F., Figueiredo, V. C., Egner, I. M., Shield, A., Cameron-Smith, D., Coombes, J. S., & Peake, J. M. (2015). Post-exercise cold water immersion attenuates acute anabolic signalling and long-term adaptations in muscle to strength training. The Journal of Physiology, 593(18), 4285–4301. https://doi.org/10.1113/JP270570
55. Russell, S., Jenkins, D., Rynne, S., Halson, S. L., & Kelly, V. (2019). What is mental fatigue in elite sport? Perceptions from athletes and staff. European Journal of Sport Science, 19(10), 1367–1376. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2019.1618397
56. Russell, S., Johnston, R. D., Stanimirovic, R., & Halson, S. L. (2024). Global practitioner assessment and management of mental fatigue and mental recovery in high-performance sport: A need for evidence-based best-practice guidelines. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, 34(1), e14491. https://doi.org/10.1111/SMS.14491;WGROUP:STRING:PUBLICATION
57. Salas, E., Cooke, N. J., & Rosen, M. A. (2008). On teams, teamwork, and team performance: discoveries and developments. Human Factors, 50(3), 540–547. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872008X288457
58. Sautillet, B., Bourdillon, N., Millet, G. P., Billaut, F., Hassar, A., Moufti, H., Ahmaïdi, S., & Costalat, G. (2024). Hot But Not Cold Water Immersion Mitigates the Decline in Rate of Force Development following Exercise-Induced Muscle Damage. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000003513
59. Scott, D. and Bradley, P. (2020) 'PHYSICAL ANALYSIS OF THE FIFA WOMEN'S WORLD CUP FRANCE 2019™', https://digitalhub.fifa.com/m/4f40a98140d305e2/original/zijqly4oednqa5gffgaz-pdf.pdf, Available: FIFA. Available at: https://digitalhub.fifa.com/m/4f40a98140d305e2/original/zijqly4oednqa5gffgaz-pdf.pdf.
60. Shinohara, M., Kouzaki, M., Yoshihisa, T., & Fukunaga, T. (1998). Efficacy of tourniquet ischemia for strength training with low resistance. European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology, 77(1–2), 189–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004210050319
61. Smith, M. R., Coutts, A. J., Merlini, M., Deprez, D., Lenoir, M., & Marcora, S. M. (2015). Mental Fatigue Impairs Soccer-Specific Physical and Technical Performance. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 48(2), 267–276. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000000762
62. Smith, M. R., Thompson, C., Marcora, S. M., Skorski, S., Meyer, T., & Coutts, A. J. (2018). Mental Fatigue and Soccer: Current Knowledge and Future Directions. Sports Medicine 2018 48:7, 48(7), 1525–1532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-018-0908-2
63. Solsona, R., Méline, T., Borrani, F., Deriaz, R., Lacroix, J., Normand-Gravier, T., Candau, R., Racinais, S., & Sanchez, A. M. J. (2023). Active recovery vs hot- or cold-water immersion for repeated sprint ability after a strenuous exercise training session in elite skaters. Journal of Sports Sciences, 41(11), 1126–1135. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2023.2259267,
64. Steward, C. J., Hill, M., Menzies, C., Bailey, S. J., Rahman, M., Thake, C. D., Pugh, C. J. A., & Cullen, T. (2024). Post exercise hot water immersion and hot water immersion in isolation enhance vascular, blood marker, and perceptual responses when compared to exercise alone. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, 34(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/SMS.14600,
65. Sun, H., Soh, K. G., & Xu, X. (2022). Nature Scenes Counter Mental Fatigue-Induced Performance Decrements in Soccer Decision-Making. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 877844. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.877844
66. Thomas, K., Dent, J., Howatson, G., & Goodall, S. (2017). Etiology and Recovery of Neuromuscular Fatigue after Simulated Soccer Match Play. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 49(5), 955–964. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000001196
67. Thorpe, R. T., Atkinson, G., Drust, B., & Gregson, W. (2017). Monitoring fatigue status in elite team-sport athletes: Implications for practice. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 12. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2016-0434
68. Thorpe, R. T., Strudwick, A. J., Buchheit, M., Atkinson, G., Drust, B., & Gregson, W. (2015). Monitoring fatigue during the in-season competitive phase in elite soccer players. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 10(8). https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2015-0004
69. Thorpe, R. T., Strudwick, A. J., Buchheit, M., Atkinson, G., Drust, B., & Gregson, W. (2016). Tracking morning fatigue status across in-season training weeks in elite soccer players. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 11(7). https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2015-0490
70. Zelikovski, A., Kaye, C. L., Fink, G., Spitzer, S. A., & Shapiro, Y. (1993). The effects of the modified intermittent sequential pneumatic device (MISPD) on exercise performance following an exhaustive exercise bout. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 27(4), 255–259. https://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1332015&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract

Header Image by thearcticblues (Cropped)